Blog

i-'ON CITY AND ZONING LAW
(Law1 QO of 1972. 56 of 1982, 7 of 1990, 28 of 1991,
91 (I) of 1992, 55(1)’ of 1993, 72(1) ,of 1998, 59{I) of ~ 999, 142(1) of 1999,
241 (I) 101./2002.29(1) of 2005,. 135(1) of 2006 and11(1) of. 2007)
Order in accordance with the article..!
MANDATE 2/2007
Code<let's hold a Public Hearing
in the context of examining applications for urban planning permission
for the creation of golf courses,
which are installed on a basis
paragraph C5(n) of the Decision of the Council of Ministers
no. 61 :514, hemepomeVias 16.2.2005 .
1.
The Public Hearing i:rtroTeJieI’ part of the process. which is intended to
Decision of the Executive Council no. 61.614, date 16.2.2005 reference
with golf course resurfacing policy, Ms, it is intended to ensure
conditions of transparency and civility in making decisions regarding
applications for the granting of planning permission for the creation of golf courses;
2.
The public response is primarily to the fullest and most
.accurate update of the Town Planning Authority, so that K(JTQ is seen as complete
,
evaluation of an application for the granting of a town planning permit for the creation of a yljPedos
golf. To achieve this Pursuit, the Town Planning Authority has the possibility to
xetriQ'~I I<a!, n.a take into account the;a;prps~is ,those:It is referred to in paragraph C5!d) her ., .
“AV Offer”Decision of the Prime Minister “Council, •. but
.•. “p,
.others
… stakeholders, as will be decided by the Town Planning Authority,but no
search for additional information,Thanks to her publicity. . ..
.
. 8
Prepare for public hearings’
3,
….. .
The Urban Planning Authority must conduct the public hearing in a manner
… ,’ .. An efficient production is to ensure that the time of listening and of’
. . ‘.
‘.
.;.
… :…. :. :participate: she is not immune,:jasifpus all from there”píis1TOUexmPl1petei the .’ .
Cicrosis,That's why,.against the opponent 'aiaOiKCJo'iCJ,rι’ Paleo60μl/(r'c Principle, not ‘
will allow the replay . positions and opinions that have already been expressed
previously, the use of time from the hearing for the Ka~ presentation
“, ,,,,”.<…?,life:riJCJ.G{ ~.em?of K~I a:eat,trqUj~~.re~z()Y-I:(lI ~~e~ .m~ :i:1~. §.ξEq~~~εΥη (I[:sion 9 . ‘.
. .
for ΥΙΝΙΝΟΝΟΝΟΝΟ)e,chri.ivηv.fj J~UIφIVIQ”T~I:oigqYme..Vf:~ .ΠC1rouQΊQs~is h .
'top6Set'ls; The Urban Planning Authority is instrumental in shaping the views
:.. of place’ ,the eventual repetition of the same views by 'Pi:Yes::Hello Tameri,
but it will focus attention on the value of these:data and. of
of arguments presented during the public hearing: …. ..
4.
Everything;; THE information 1\01 the data to be presented by the parties
at the public hearing will be public Information, at OITO!They will have you
offending all parties involved in the process, except for the Town Planning Authority
decide otherwise for a specific reason.
Invitation and information of public hearings;:
5.
The Town Planning Authority rolled out the main parts with relevant information. where)s
these are specified in ,paragraph C5(d) of his snuffing Decision
Council of Ministers, as well as any other parties he decides to invite.
6,
Any of the parties invited to the public hearing, it is
may declare in writing that he does not wish to participate in the procedure or to
declare that he will limit himself to submitting his positions and opinions in writing.
1.
In the notice we set out the main points in which
, is intended’ the 'd,publication of plans and the date of its implementation is determined
listening, as well as the deadline for the submission of the parties' written statements
in relation to the main issues determined by the Town Planning Authority or in relation to
all matters that are essential to the evaluation of the application. ‘
8
8,
.
.
The parties must agree in writing, their opinions. inside the
l(indefinite:term. In 'Peritri.iJoi who has already
submit his views to the City Planning Commission. context .prevEsteris ,
mediation~then it is not necessary for him to restate his views..
.
.
9.
. . -‘.
.,
”
:’
..
~.
.
15-year-old news articles, ‘
of CRIT reports’ of the leaders’ of participating parties, then it is appropriate to
Also submit a summary of the main points, or (nroio should not exceed KOTc;i
.rule them 4 Qa~1Ulographed pages.
·,
.
,’10” '··SisennR~Fei; seatl~()they are submitted e!necessary Vi)., QPofèigoVral. the
, , ;, generalities, (‘jl; ~~PSRITII<es-rsitol;3t;yours,;;αl 61 unproven allegations or,ok:maintenance ‘
which does not. are related to the other evaluation. The Urban Planning Authority
,
takes into account positions Mr:a,the view ,where, is not sufficiently determined L, hey~
, ,clearly manifests or manifestly manifests a positive or negative bias against the
worth it,qνW:maturity.”,
The organization is supported by official grants”oKTOieKapples;Y,eh{on6ta and dedomtn~ ,
\
:
~,. ,.. .’;’ 11. .’ :Stl~,Investments will have a significant impact on construction (p.s.i;, or;(part:;
“.,.,:,:,two days; mpl,,-tiβοu\,/c κι::ii-Op{i)uς\”fu,g” Those who were treated as’ &i~v <
, , ‘ City planning({I leave that I could,to use’
,,1~.
.
,<
the fqki:;her reason;h9.”PIT9, ukaraXWP<“ΨV;ΤQI,6lq the .sheT.li<:a., flip. ;:tho>~;
, , ” ‘ “‘:” “ΆitC1eιjJ!has I9iti;?~~,~,Q'r,~on .qRjzorai~~ P”transcript()y~I5(d)(ii) ~,(ni) ,of A1Tofas~s: ,
;THE MINISTER:COUNCIL. AGAINST THE OLARATION OF THE PUBLIC COPE FOR SKSPR;is , ,
, ,.’
f;daycare:kFi'i<:further preparation of the documents that will be sent.
.
~
:
.’
”
… ‘
.’
”
.’
.
.
.
Public hearing process
13.
The course of the public hearing is guided by the Director of the Department
of Town Planning and Housing. as a Town Planning Authority, who will preside
14.
The process will begin with an opening statement by the Town Planning Authority at
which would identify the elements and main characters:Terispka of the application irou will
examined at the public hearing, the reason why the
public hearing (paragraph rS(b) of the Decision of the Ministerial Council) and
will be determined in advance<regarding the public hearing program. and the series with the
which parties will present their views.
15.
Following the process. the applicant or the IOI advisers) they will comment iO
content of the opening statement and will clearly explain the reasons for
whom they consider to be justified in granting a planning permit. The
λόγοι αυτοί δεν πρέπεινα είνα! γε,νlκοί και ασαφείς, ούτε και να εκφράζουν αυθαίρετες· .
κάlπροσωπικές εκτιμήσεις ϊΟυ οιτητή.
16.
8
After the applicant, παρουσιάζουν διαδοχικά τις θέσεις τους τα κύρια μέρη και τέλος
οποιοδήποτε άτομο ή φOpέαςσυμμεiέχει στη διαδικασία,·κατόmv σχετικής α1Τόφασης
of the Town Planning Authority.
17.
Η nολεοδομική Αρχή και ο αιτητής ή εκπρόσωπός του αιτητή είναι δυνατόν να
ιnτoβάλouν διευκρινιστικές ερωτήσεις σε .κά{1Ε μξ.ρος πρυπαρουσιάζεταl. ενώπιον της
nί)λtοοομικής Αρχήςκ:ατά τηδιαδ,κασία.·
16.
.
. Κατά τη διάρκεια της ~ΚΡQ’Qσηςδεeαf;Π1τρέπεrαιο διάλογος μεταξύ των μερών.
. All parties participating in the hearing will be responsible)1 arroMe1otically in
Urban Planning Authority, except p:v the Town Planning Authority requests or allows the exchange
business between the parties: .
.
19. . According to;the message is OK);q parts will. παροιλσιάζουν τα κύρια σημεία των
· . θέσεων του.ς. πουθαέχουνήδη iJίToβληθείεγγράφωςKOI θα παρέχουν τις διευκρινήσεις
που θα ζητήσει η Πολεοδομική Αρχή. Σεπφhπωση πουαυτό δεν είναι δυνατό να γίνει
amr;sa. then the requested information will be sent to the Planning Authority in
·
)
.
. in a timely manner..
. 20.>.·
….
.
.
StO.Telo~.tisdi~djisssi~~.~~,:9It's beautiful(]Lι,who; of thae~ ·possibility .
· . Parotlitissii; of.i::a1aliKTikoUTtt;Ψi:;(JΞfqψεμJV.καιθέσεων. στο πλαίσιο των οποίων,will
.Πόρέχεται η δυVC1τότητcσχρλiαqμbμ ~ΨY ,~Q’ε,(.i)V:ποuκα1έΘέσαν τα ιn:r9~Oτη’~ μέρη: . . ..
:- .’:- .;,-. 0′”;_
21.
….
r;
,
‘. :: .’: ‘.- :~ -‘0 .’~’ :~ .-~’.’•.’~’ .’~’ .-,:’ :. :~: .~ :.:
<.< .~.,
~
~
•• ” ~ ~ . ‘. ‘.
.<
,
.’
Η nολεοδομlκή Αρχή θα όλοκληρώνει τη διαδικασία της δημόσιας ακρόασης
χωρίς να ανακοινώνει την απόφqΟηη.j:α συμΊΠΡάσ:ματα της σε σχέση με την αίτηση.
.’. ,Διάρκει.α 1Dc.:.δ.nΥόΡlαS,.αΚQQgp’ης;c,,’;;”Χ’-··
..-..
.’
,
.
22: . .. Ηπόλεοδdμlκή Αρχή: θt{titfΈΆtriv:έιi:θ~vη YIOTbvέAEVΧO της δl~δIKαaίας,έ101·
on the one hand, the identification of all documented positions
and “pqpseon poi.r .ei.YQishE:nt;.s,with,Complete application in a fair manner, another
on the other hand, to analyze the completion of the process within a reasonable time
'ri-erithosR,Q·
.., .. ..
.
…
•
.
””
~
.,~
‘.
~
,.
c
..
…
4,
23.
The Town Planning Authority has the authority to discuss the procedure and to
remains at a specified date and time: In cases where the date mJ
the time of resumption of the procedure is announced before the interruption of the session. it won't be
the sending of relevant invitations for the new conference.
24.
The public hearing must be completed within a reasonable time frame
and cannot be extended for a period beyond 30 working days.
Other settings
25.
Persons who disrupt the public hearing have no right
participation in the media<of listening. The Town Planning Authority has the authority to
δl<;orders the removal of the public hearing room,
anyone ever’ interfere with authorization or harass, with
any ir6po the process.
26.
8
OR
Πολεοδομική Αρχή είναι δυνοτό να O1iοφασίσει την πραγματοποίηση
αιίσκεψηςοτσ χώρlJ της .πρότιθέμε\lηςσνόΊΠυξης. Σε τέτοιο περrnτωoη, will
προσl\ολDίιvrαι να iίαραστOύν, εάν το επιθυμούν, όλα ία μέρη που συμμετέχουν στη
δημόο-ια αKρόao:or.
Day: ._\~~’\..